What is about this area of the world that turns out the odd fanatic that wants to execute people who are “informed and a danger” to tyrants who want to control the world????
Could it be that in the genetic puddle of a few “bent and broken” families that are obviously a little “better off” than the regular guy and gal on the street have produced maniacs who think people would literally be executed if they don’t agree with them?
Here’s a misguided and vindictive person who holds a position in academia, which of course is even more dangerous to humanity, but gets to publish his tripe and actually get’s his own employer to legitimize his ravings and rantings.
I’ll be the first to volunteer for his “final solution” as long as he personally shows up at my door to do the deed!
He will get a very warm welcome indeed!
I think we all remember what a gutless and insane group the last ones were that attempted this execution idea!!!!!
UPDATE: He also wants to kill The Pope!
University Of Graz “Death To Deniers!” Professor Richard Parncutt Calls For The Execution Of Pope Benedict
By P Gosselin on 28. Dezember 2012
It’s nice to see that academia in Austria is getting more and more tolerant with every passing day. In fact we haven’t seen this level of tolerance in about 70 years.
University of Graz Professor Richard Parncutt. Photo source: Uni-Graz./
There’s been much buzz in the blogs recently about the seemingly psychotic music professor calling for the death penalty for skeptics of IPCC science. He claims that by being skeptical of climate science, we are hindering necessary policy measures that will supposedly prevent the deaths of hundreds of millions of future people. A figure the loony prof calls “conservative”.
Parncutt also wants to have the Pope executed
Reader Quinn over at WUWT now brings our attention to a report on how Prof Richard Parncutt has also called for the execution of the head of the Catholic Church, Pope Benedict . WND Faith website here writes:
‘The pope and perhaps some of his closest advisers should be sentenced to death,’ wrote Richard Parncutt, a music teacher at the University of Graz, Austria.
Richard ParncuttRichard Parncutt, Professor of Systematic Musicology, University of Graz, Austria, reckons people like Watts, Tallbloke, Singer, Michaels, Monckton, McIntyre and me (there are too many to list) should be executed. He’s gone full barking mad, and though he says these are his “personal opinions” they are listed on his university web site.
For all the bleating of those who say they’ve had real “death threats“, we get discussions about executing skeptics from Professors, wielding the tyrannical power of the state. Was he paid by the state to write these simplistic, immature, “solutions”? Do taxpayers fund his web expenses? (And what the heck is systematic musicology?)
Prof Richard Parncutt says:
“I have always been opposed to the death penalty in all cases…”
“Even mass murderers [like Breivik] should not be executed, in my opinion.”
“GW deniers fall into a completely different category from Behring Breivik. They are already causing the deaths of hundreds of millions of future people. We could be speaking of billions, but I am making a conservative estimate.”
If a jury of suitably qualified scientists estimated that a given GW denier had already, with high probability (say 95%), caused the deaths of over one million future people, then s/he would be sentenced to death. The sentence would then be commuted to life imprisonment if the accused admitted their mistake, demonstrated genuine regret, AND participated significantly and positively over a long period in programs to reduce the effects of GW (from jail) – using much the same means that were previously used to spread the message of denial. At the end of that process, some GW deniers would never admit their mistake and as a result they would be executed. Perhaps that would be the only way to stop the rest of them. The death penalty would have been justified in terms of the enormous numbers of saved future lives.
The Big Green Lie 
Let’s have a beer! You make beer with sugar or starch components. Brewer’s yeast is added and the yeast grows, like humans it produces waste products. the largest of these wastes are alcohol, carbon Dioxide and aldehydes. Most of the CO2 is vented off, but some is kept to make the fizz. That and the alcohol kill off the yeast cells, and you now have a beer. Millions of yeast cells are just like humans, busily producing waste components and multiplying until they have created a toxic world that terminates them. Cities are the main cause of this GW, and the country folk feed them. So all are part of the eco-system that will eventually destroy itself.
But wait a minute, ask the guy with the gro=op what helps his plants grow. More CO2 more heat, more light! So as we produce more CO2 plants will gro faster, less heat will be required, more CO2 will be consumed. Mother Nature will try to balance things and as we plant more trees, and green stuff grows we will survive for a long time.
But with more heat in the atmosphere there will be more violent winds, so hold on tight were in for a rough ride.
Millenium coming soon,
best wishes to all
BOB
Global Warming!!! Please send my share to Calgary. We need it to keep our heating bill down! What the GW advocates don’t understand is that GW is a natural thing that we (humans) have accelerated since the industrial revolution. However, as it gets warmer there will be less Heating required for cities, and mother earth will compensate by moving the tree line further north and growing more vegetation faster. I’m originally from Ontario, I miss the warmer weather? and lots of snow.
But here you go, read this.
Checking out at the store, the young cashier suggested to the older woman, that she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren’t good for the environment.
The woman apologized and explained, “We didn’t have this green thing back in my earlier days.”
The young clerk responded, “That’s our problem today. Your generation did not care enough to save our environment f or future generations.”
She was right — our generation didn’t have the green thing in its day.
Back then, we returned milk bottles, soda bottles and beer bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over. So they really were truely recycled.
But we didn’t have the green thing back in our day.
Grocery stores bagged our groceries in brown paper bags, that we reused for numerous things, most memorable besides household garbage bags, was the use of brown paper bags as book covers for our schoolbooks. This was to ensure that public property, (the books provided for our use by the school) was not defaced by our scribblings. Then we were able to personalize our books on the brown paper bags.
But too bad we didn’t do the green thing back then.
We walked up stairs, because we didn’t have an escalator in every store and office building. We walked to the grocery store and didn’t climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go two blocks.
But she was right. We didn’t have the green thing in our day.
Back then, we washed the baby’s diapers because we didn’t have the throwaway kind. We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy-gobbling machine burning up 220 volts — wind and solar power really did dry our clothes back in our early days. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing.
But that young lady is right; we didn’t have the green thing back in our day.
Back then, we had one TV, or radio, in the house — not a TV in every room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief (remember them?), not a screen the size of the state of Montana. In the kitchen, we blended and stirred by hand because we didn’t have electric machines to do everything for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we used wadded up old newspapers to cushion it, not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap. Back then, we didn’t fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn. We used a push mower that ran on human power. We exercised by working so we didn’t need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity.
But she’s right; we didn’t have the green thing back then.
We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull.
But we didn’t have the green thing back then.
Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service. We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And we didn’t need a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites 23,000 miles out in space in order to find the nearest burger joint.
But isn’t it sad the current generation laments how wasteful we old folks were just because we didn’t have the green thing back then?
Btw I’m 60. Send me some GW to help me make it through the winter.
So So TRUE!!!!
This is great news…this nutcase actually helps us! Hope it goes far and wide. I loved the responses, had to stop reading them. They were 99.9% angry at him. They know their own history and are proud. -Mel