California may be the U.S. “poster child” for fiscal failure but Ontario is soooo much worse!

Posted: March 18, 2014 in Uncategorized

Whenever anyone wants to point out all that’s wrong with loopy doopy financial failures and how NOT TO run a Government which handles people’s tax dollars or rather how they “blow the bank” with tax dollars, they always point to that sunny, severely bankrupt State of California, where movie stars get a crack at playing a political lead role and it usually ends up in disaster even though that role would sell millions of tickets at a clown show!

Well, move over Cali, here comes Ontario with a much larger “clown show” running a much bigger debt load YET nobody is laughing!

The head actor of this current “clown show” is Minister Bob Chiarelli. (Courtesy Bing)

Highlights of the Fraser Institute report:Ontario “much worse”

Comparing the Debt Burdens of California and Ontario

Highlights of the Fraser Institute report

On March 8, 2014, the Vancouver-based Fraser Institute published a research study comparing the debt burdens of the state of California and the province of Ontario. Within the United States, many people consider California to represent a prime example of irresponsible government spending coupled with poor cash management. However, the Fraser Institute report uses a number of measures to compare Ontario’s situation to that of California. In almost all cases, Ontario is much worse.
Here are the highlights of the report:
·         California’s current debt in the form of government-issued bonds is US $144.8 billion, while Ontario carries CDN $267.5 billion, almost double the amount of California.
·         This figure actually understates the disparity between the two regions, as California has a much larger economy. The gross debt in the form of bonds is 7.6% of California’s economy, while it is a “whopping” 40.9% of Ontario’s economy, more than five times as large as California.
·         Per capita, each Ontarian’s share of provincial government debt is CDN $20,166 (i.e. $80,664 for a family of four), compared to US$ 3,844 in state government debt for each resident of California.
·         Servicing this debt through interest payments is more costly in Ontario. 9.2% of budget revenues in Ontario are devoted to interest payments, compared to 2.8% in California.
·         Ontario’s expenditures as a share of the economy grew from 15.5% in 2001-2002 to 19% in 2011-2012.
·         Over this period, total government spending in Ontario has been steadily increasing from one year to the next. Thus, unlike California, Ontario has not managed to stabilize the growth of the debt in terms of GDP.
·         Ontario’s net debt for 2012-2013 is the second highest as a percentage of GDP of any Canadian province, trailing only Quebec. However, Quebec’s annual budget deficit was only half as large – 0.7 % compared to Ontario’s 1.4 %.
·         Ontario’s budget analysts project that from 2012-2013 to 2015-2016 net interest payments will represent the fastest growing expense for the provincial government, growing at 5.5 % annually – more than twice the projected rate of health care expenditures.
Robert Lyman
Ottawa, March 18, 2014
Blog Editor note: Ontario Energy Minister Bob Chiarelli admitted Ontario is spending $1B a year on power generation from wind energy; he also admits we don’t need it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s