How completely CORRUPT has the “Green Energy and Climate Change rhetoric” become?…you be the judge!!!

Posted: October 6, 2013 in Uncategorized

From daily announcements from our own Government about how great their Green Energy Plan is going, to the daily drivel in mainstream news outlets that the world is basically doomed and humanity will shortly be up to their proverbial asses in water due to melting glaciers, here is just “how far gone” the whole Green Energy/Climate Change idiocy  has become.

Two stories that will reflect this claim are as follows.

Every “informed” and “rational” citizen on this planet should be OUTRAGED!

GREEN ENERGY LIES

Ontario’s electricity bills: rising costs or a regressive tax? You decide

On September 10, 2013, when the temperature hit 34 degrees in Toronto, demand for electricity in Ontario peaked at 8 PM when we were consuming 22,417 megawatts (MW) of power.  At that point according to the Adequacy Report from the IESO, we still had excess capacity−8,437 MW in fact, or enough to power over seven million average Ontario homes.

So the question becomes, if we have power to spare, why do we continue to add expensive sources of power generation like wind and solar to the electricity grid?   Surely the addition of that expensive generation that must be backed up will do nothing more than drive electricity prices up.
Has our electricity system turned into nothing more than a form of wealth transfer or, perhaps, a regressive tax?  The latter is defined as: “A tax that takes a larger percentage from low-income people than from high-income people. A regressive tax is generally a tax that is applied uniformly. This means that it hits lower-income individuals harder.”
As it turns out, the management of our electricity system by the Liberal government during the past 10 years has been both.   Consider the following points and see if any of them were meant to keep our electricity prices competitive with other markets, and that might have helped to create jobs in Ontario. Job creation may have resulted in tax revenue that could have been use to reduce our deficit, improve health care, built better transit, or provide better government services.
Reality in Ontario today
Here is what ratepayers must accept:
§     Paying for smart meters and resulting time-of-use pricing–we eat supper after 7 PM and do our laundry in the middle of the night
§     Paying to replace smart meters because they “don’t communicate”
§     Paying for the development of the “smart grid” which turns out to be not so smart.
§     Subsidizing very large energy consumers by picking up a chunk ($200/400 million) of what they would have to pay if they were a household, just to keep remaining manufacturing jobs
§     Paying huge Net Revenue payments to gas plant electricity generators for sitting idle
§     Paying wind generators to not produce electricity
§     Paying solar generators to not produce electricity
§     Paying to erect meteorological stations to measure how much wind generators might have produced so that we can pay them for not producing
§     Paying for “steaming off” perfectly clean nuclear power from Bruce Power
§     Paying for the Ontario Power Authority to run ads on TV, radio and the newspapers to tell us to conserve electricity, racking up average annual spending of $300 million
§     Paying for costs of operating the Ontario Power Authority, which we were told was a temporary long-term planning agency
§     Paying to get the local distribution company to pick up old refrigerators and being told it’s free
§     Paying to move two gas generation plants at a cost of about $1 billion
§     Paying to have the school boards in Toronto and elsewhere put solar panels on their roofs so they could generate money to fix some of the roofs
§     Paying for grants to people that can afford to purchase new expensive electric vehicles (EVs)
§     Paying to put in charging stations for those EVs that use the streets but don’t pay gas taxes
§     Paying for someone else to use coupons to purchase CFL or LED light bulbs
§     Paying for grants to small and medium sized companies to retrofit their lighting systems
§     Paying for expensive electricity generated by solar panels placed on your local municipally owned arena
§     Paying for grants so your municipality can exchange incandescent and halogen street lights to LED lights
§     Paying your local distribution company extra money each year because their revenue deteriorated because you conserved electricity, so they asked for and got a rate increase blessed by the Ontario Energy Board
§     Paying to connect wind and solar generators to the transmission system run by Hydro One, a wholly owned provincial monopoly
§     Paying the cost of electricity produced by your neighbour for those solar panels on his roof for which he gets 80 cents a kilowatt hour
§     Paying for the costs of solar power produced by corporations like Loblaws, Canadian Tire,  IKEA, etc., which they sell into the electricity grid at 70 cents a kilowatt hour, but buy the power they need at the same (or lower) price that you pay
§     Paying forever for “residual stranded debt” that should have been paid off 5 years ago.
§     Paying for the sale of surplus electricity to New York, Michigan, etc. at a price 75/85% below its cost
§     Paying HST on our electricity bills which automatically added 7% to its cost and generates well in excess of $1 billion for the province’s coffers
Now look over these 28 points and think about which represent “wealth transfers” and which represent a “regressive tax.”   Review them again and pick out any that added cost-effective new generation.  Hint: you will probably have trouble finding the latter!
Ontario’s legacy
Energy Minister Chiarelli recently bragged about the reputed $35 billion in new investment attracted to the province by the Green Energy and Green Economy Act and the 31,000 jobs that it supposedly created. Those 31,000 jobs (most are relatively short term construction jobs) will cost the ratepayers of the province over $3 million each.
What Minister Chiarelli didn’t say was that the $35-billion investment will cost ratepayers well over $100/120 billion by the time those 20-year contracts have ended, and most of that will be extracted from the pockets of many Ontarians who cannot afford the “regressive tax” it has become. Many are discovering they can’t afford to turn their lights on for fear of being unable to buy groceries.
What a legacy for the McGuinty/Wynne team.
Parker Gallant,
October 3, 2013
The opinions expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily Wind Concerns Ontario.

 

CLIMATE CHANGE LIARS

Fake Nobel Laureate Steve Running

October 6, 2013 at 10:45 am

Like those sad souls who walk around with military medals they themselves didn’t  earn on their chests, a forestry professor continues to bask in undeserved glory.

Steve_Running_nobel_laureat

click to see original

In 1979, Steven Running completed a PhD in Forest Ecophysiology. He is now a forestry professor at the University of Montana – and an environmental activist.

In a 2007 essay titled 5 Stages of Climate Grief, Running grandiosely describes himself as “a climate scientist.” He declares that lifestyle changes are necessary to combat global warming and says that, while there’s no guarantee we’ll be successful at stopping this warming,

doing nothing given our present knowledge is unconscionable. How otherwise can we look into our grandchildren’s eyes?

If I were him, I’d be more concerned about losing my grandchildren’s respect for another reason entirely.

Running was one of 22 people who worked on one chapter (out of 44) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2007 report. When half of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Al Gore, the other half went to the IPCC.

It did not go to Running or any other IPCC personnel. You will find neither his name nor his photograph anywhere on the NobePrize.org official website. Moreover, a year ago the IPCC issued a formal statement making it clear that it is improper to describe anyone connected to the IPCC as a Peace Prize winner.

Yet, to this day, under the heading Awards, Honors on two versions of Running’s CV, this line appears:

Co-recipient, Nobel Peace Prize 2007

It doesn’t get more bald-faced than that. Like those sad souls who walk around with military medals they themselves didn’t earn on their chests, Running continues to bask in undeserved glory.

Sixteen days ago, he delivered a talk at a college. You can see the announcement for that event as it appeared on the website of the Helena, Montana Independent Record newspaper. Nobel Laureate Steve Running proclaims the headline.

Between the headline and the first paragraph of that announcement, the word “Nobel” is used three times. We are explicitly told that

In 2007, Dr. Running received a Nobel Peace Prize for his work on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). [bold added; see this announcement in another venue here]

READ MORE HERE:

 

Advertisements
Comments
  1. helen busch says:

    Yepper, it’s like sitting here pissing yourself (that warm fuzzy feeling) waiting for your backtime cheque to come in and what you are going to spend it on.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s